Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 16:32

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What would TERFs do if there weren't such a thing as being transgender? Who would be their target?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why would an older small breed dog become obsessive about hygiene?
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Nintendo Switch 2 and Mario Kart World available today - My Nintendo News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Former Clemson DB on College Football Hall of Fame ballot - TigerNet
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Meta pauses mobile port tracking tech on Android after researchers cry foul - theregister.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How did Kate Mulgrew feel about Jeri Ryan joining the cast of Star Trek: Voyager?
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.